The decision could be about your own conduct or about that of another. Some decisions will be easy because the guidelines are clear and the matter itself is inappropriate but no harm will likely result.
Thus, it is beyond dispute that the motives of those designing and running the "War on Poverty" in the Johnson Administration were well intentioned. Who could be against ending poverty? However, it had long been observed that giving people money removed the incentive for them to earn any. Thus, Benjamin Franklin had said: In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer.
And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer. Thus, a motto of the War on Poverty was, "Not a handout, just a hand. Despite misgivings about such notions, their political Ethical consideration to certain voters and certain intellectuals was undeniable and unavoidable -- although a majority of Americans were actually outraged by them earning accusations of callousness, racism, etc.
The results were indeed Hell, as is most clearly embodied today in Detroitwhere much of the city has been abandoned, as people have fled the joblessness, crime, hostility to business, and failure of public institutions. The "solution" to the riots was a government of Democrats that drove business out of the city, allowed crime to soar, and left much of the populaton, black and white, little recourse but to leave, even when abandoning homes and property.
Baltimore and Chicago in seem to be in tight competition to emulate Detroit, even as Detroit has improved somewhat under State supervision.
Thus, two approaches to poverty, the "hand" and the "handout," were both tried; and neither worked. But you would never know it from much of public discourse, certainly not on the Left.
In the light of such a history, doubts are raised about the continuing good will of the agents and activists involved in these ideas and programs.
They begin to look more like rent seekers than like disinterested benefactors. It is noted that the dependence of voters on the largesse of politicans and bureaucrats renders them politically beholden to them, making said activists and politicians richer themselves, far more so that those relying on welfare and living in devastated and crime-ridden neighborhoods and from which they cannot be released by payments that merely maintain them in their situation.
The dynamic is the same as it was in Detroit: The transparent dishonesty, let alone folly, of this seems to escape many voters, and curiously, many of the best "educated" -- which may tell us something about the nature of their education.
Of course, the lesson here may just be corruption. Good motives and well motivated actions begin the story. Then it lapsed into less well motivated, in fact discreditable, actions. The failure of either approach, with reflection on the status serendipitously achieved by the agents and activists, results in an erosion of motive, to the point where the "educated" begin to regard Cuba and Venzuela as, remarkably and appallingly, paradigms of good government and economics -- all because they give dictatorial power and privilege to the bien pensants.
This dynamic has of course been embodied in the maxim about those "who came to do good and ended up doing well.
Only recently has it become an issue of public debate that "insider trading" laws did not apply to Members of Congress, who have freely used knowledge gained from even secret Congressional testimony to anticipate influences on markets.
But as a tale of corruption it is very different from the dilemmas where good intentions are starkly faced with with choices between a wrong whose consequences are good and right action whose consequences are bad. The most important lesson, however, for the nature of ethics is that the valences of motive and action vary independently.
Closer to home, we have the films of D. When Griffith showed the movie to the new President of the United States, Woodrow WilsonWilson is supposed to have suggested what became the title of the movie, Birth of a Nation. The storm of protest over the racism and pro-Southern sentiments of the movie moved Griffith to make his next movie, Intolerance , which detailed various historical examples of religious or political oppression.
Griffith seems to have been a very morally confused person -- although this is not unusual among the self-righteous, especially as a defense mechanism for vicious causes. In modern Hollywood, however, reproductions of the Babylon set from Intolerance shown at left and below can now be inspected at the corner of Hollywood Boulevard and Highland Avenue, next to the former Kodak now Dolby Theatre, which has become the permanent site for the Oscar telecasts.
Thus, only partially in jest, I like to say that movie business liberals have built a monument to the Ku Klux Klan at Hollywood and Highland. Political control is for political ends rather than for artistic ends, and political control also becomes impatient with mere artistic and aesthetic criteria.
Thus, political art easily degenerates into really bad art, which is what generally characterized the Nazi regime. This preserves us from facing the dilemma of morally bad but good art very often.
The Soviet equivalent of Leni Riefenstahl might be Sergei Eisensteinwhose Battleship Potemkin  is one of the real classics of movie history, from which scenes turn up even in unlikely places like The Untouchables . Eisenstein suffered from the tides of Soviet politics, as his anti-German Alexander Nevsky  was first suppressed inafter the Nazi-Soviet pact, and then released again inafter the German invasion.
In the same year, however, Khrushchev forced Boris Pasternak to turn down the Nobel Prize for Literature, because his novel, Doctor Zhivago, had been published abroad after being rejected for publication in the Soviet Union.
Nothing independent, unofficial, or unauthorized was going to be tolerated. Despite an internationally successful movie version inthe winner of multiple Oscars, Doctor Zhivago was not published in the Soviet Union until This is commonly taken to mean that morally bad practices and actions refute the value or validity of a particular religion, or of all religions.Ethical Considerations in Quality Assurance and Evaluation Activities is designed to assist organisations in deciding the appropriate level of oversight for quality assurance (QA) and vetconnexx.com has been developed by a sub-group of the Australian Health Ethics Committee (AHEC).
"We couldn't be more pleased with the mysafeworkplace® solution as it helps us respond immediately to concerns and issues our employees have. Some AI researchers are concerned by the field's power, and its ability to cause harm.
Nationally Accredited Continuing Education Courses for Psychologists, Social Workers, Counselors, and Marriage and Family Therapists.
Ethical Considerations in Decision Making Rex C. Mitchell, Ph.D. Most significant decisions in organizations are not only complex but could be considered dilemmas, because they involve fundamental conflicts between a set of economic and self-interest considerations and a competing set of ethical, legal, and social considerations.
A third ethical consideration involves maintaining anonymity of test subjects, while administering surveys or tests. Accurate reporting of research results, and making valid conclusions, are also ethical considerations when scientists undertake important studies.